Re:

Harmon Seaver wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 30, 2004 at 03:21:46PM -0400, Nathanael Anderson wrote:
>>>From what I have seen intimate is dead, I am working on getting an up to date version that is based off of familiar that can boot off of sd and compile.
>>Nat Anderson
> I don't know why you would say it's dead -- it works very well here. Have you
> tried it?

The project seems dead (not being maintained); the most mails the list
has recieved over the past few months are either Spam or questions
regarding if the list is still being used. I'm sure the OS still runs
quite well (although at some point the underlying Familiar layer might
cause a conflict of some sort since Familiar is constantly being worked
on; e.g. if/when Familiar kernel finally switches to soft-floats, that
might royally mess up a lot of Intimate's programs).
Received on Sat May 01 2004 - 21:34:10 EDT