RE: [SUMMARY] Intimate on microdrive with 0.5-pre Fami liar

From: Munson, Jason (MED) <Jason.Munson_at_med.ge.com>
Date: Mon, 8 Oct 2001 17:31:51 -0500

I need to verify this, I was under the ASSumption that the Intimate
installer would have inserted that module, but now I see that that might
not be the case. I'll try it tonight and post results tomorrow, along
with interim documentation if it works.

Thanks, everyone!

Jason

-----Original Message-----
From: Hietaniemi Jarkko (NRC/Boston)
[mailto:jarkko.hietaniemi_at_nokia.com]
Sent: Monday, October 08, 2001 5:29 PM
To: Munson, Jason (MED); intimate_at_handhelds.org
Cc: familiar_at_handhelds.org
Subject: RE: [Intimate] [SUMMARY] Intimate on microdrive with 0.5-pre
Fami liar

> Anybody else have problems with this procedure and a 340 MB
Microdrive?
> My install, after following the instructions, ended up running out of
> space on a 3670.

Are you *certain* that your microdrive got mounted? I remember seeing
problems not unlike this when the mounting failed for some reason or
another? (like the reiserfs modules being somehow bungled, nowadays
I explicitly

        ipkg install reiserfs-module
        ipkg install reiserfs-modules-2.4.7-modules-rmk3-np1-devfs

before even running the beta-installer) If the microdrive isn't
mounted, the rsync will obviously run aground pretty quickly...
the installation *should* fit even on an 340MB microdrive: I have
"Used" of only 145880 kB.

> After dropping back to a command line, I had only 128K free in
> the root FS.

What does 'df' show? Is the /dev/hda1 really mounted?
Received on Mon Oct 08 2001 - 14:32:30 EDT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Mon Jul 25 2005 - 17:21:11 EDT