Re: Dual booting Intimate with CE.

I vote for both!

I have found it impossible to build a > 2.4.4 kernel with jffs2
and tmpfs (the replacement for ramfs) which is < 512k.

I am already setup with a 768k kernel partition.

Dwayne (jacques)

> I'd vote for the former, with built in support for chain loading kernels
> from within linux.. Like th e two-kernel monte stuff for x86 kernels...
>
> But in the absence of that... then a 768Kb kernel with devfs, touchscreen,
> usb etc would be far better than a 512K one without.
>
> Jim
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: intimate-admin@handhelds.org
> [mailto:intimate-admin@handhelds.org]On Behalf Of Robin Cutshaw
> Sent: 13 July 2001 14:02
> To: Hicks, Jamey; Patrick Glennon; intimate@handhelds.org
> Subject: Re: [Intimate] Dual booting Intimate with CE.
>
>
> On Fri, Jul 13, 2001 at 06:23:30AM -0500, Hicks, Jamey wrote:
> >
> > fit in 512KB. I think either Familiar 0.5 should use a 768KB kernel
> > partition or else the bootldr should get jffs2 support.
> >
> > Jamey
> >
>
> I'd vote for the latter!
>
> Robin
Received on Mon Jul 16 15:45:57 2001