Alan Cox wrote:
> On Fri, 2002-05-31 at 13:57, Benjamin Meyer wrote:
>
>>I think that the only real major reason for having X11 on the system would be
>>to put the applications on another machine and run them over the network. If
>>for example you could run qvfb in X11 and remotly host qpe with say every
>>single applications out there that would be a very cool thing, but it would
>>look exactly like the normal qpe.
>
>
> I put my PC110 on the lan, the tightvnc X11 setup on it allows the
> desktop to be viewed from multiple places, and if I have a little hack
> running I did then it automatically pops up on my desktop.
This sounds like a reason for having VNC installed, not a reason for X11.
There is a VNC server for the framebuffer too...
http://killefiz.de/zaurus/showdetail.php?app=21
>
> If my PC110 is anywhere in wireless range I can bring it up on my TV or
> other PC's. Its a very very powerful option, even though tightVNC is
> limiting since I can't just make the X apps hop from server to server as
> I'd like
Yeah, being able to migrate apps across server would be a very usefull
feature!
Received on Sat Jun 01 05:57:07 2002
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Tue May 04 2004 - 09:50:07 EDT