Re: Wake up call: Bugzilla and opie release date

From: Thomas <spiralman.a.t.softhome.net>
Date: Wed May 22 2002 - 00:36:53 EDT

hmm, id disagree with the classification of some of these, so we should
probably work on that as well. (162, for instance, shoul be in trivial, not
normal because a) its a game, and b) you should be able to tell the color
from the suite). as im pretty bored durring the day, ill see what i can do
about some of these...

360: i think this is actually an app problem, it should show at least what is
in the documents, as long as the mimetype works. all apps should allow a *
mimetype that lets you view any filetype (especially textedit, for which only
files ending in .txt seem to work)

thomas
spiralman@softhome.net

On Tuesday 21 May 2002 12:39, Oliver Fels wrote:
> Hi.
>
> This is again a reminder.
>
> Scanning through Bugzilla, I noticed that only 16 bugs are recorded of
> which are 10 recorded by me.
>
> Is that all ? Is OPIE as stable ?
>
> I don't think so. So here again is the request to all for testing and
> fixing, on or the other- or both.
>
> For the records and fixing purposes, I have extracted the bug numbers below
> and their severity:
>
> Blocker (3):
> 357
> 289
> 352
>
> Critical (2):
> 353
> 360
>
> Major (3):
> 361
> 355
> 358
>
> Normal (3):
> 354
> 235
> 162
>
> Trivial (1):
> 359
>
> Enhancement (4):
> 192
> 356
> 305
> 345
>
> Eyeryone is requested to confirm or deny them - or better fix em ;-)
>
> Thanks to all contributors.
>
> Oliver
> _______________________________________________
> Open Source User Interface and Apps built on Qt Embedded
> Opie mailing list
> Opie@handhelds.org
> http://handhelds.org/mailman/listinfo/opie
Received on Wed May 22 04:36:59 2002

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Tue May 04 2004 - 09:50:05 EDT