Re: Patch adding support for FSC Loox N560

From: pHilipp Zabel <philipp.zabel_at_gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2007 19:25:24 +0100

On Dec 13, 2007 7:32 AM, Marek Vašut <marek.vasut_at_gmail.com> wrote:
> Dne Thursday 13 of December 2007 01:58:13 jste napsal(a):
> > Hello Marek,
> >
> > Thursday, December 13, 2007, 2:15:25 AM, you wrote:
> > > Ok, sure, I will clean it up. Thanks for the suggestions. I will try to
> > > send fixed patch soon (hopefully tomorow). As for the differences, N560
> > > and C550 differ only in GPS module (560 has it, 550 doesnt) and cpu speed
> > > so they really can be put together. Any suggestions for unified name ?
> >
> > Unified name, no. But there's no need to have duplicated source code
> > for two of them in this case. Just add machine record to the existing
> > code, and where needed, is_machine_XXX() checks, voila. Well, back to
> > name, using name of just one device is quick solution (i.e. c550/ or
> > c550.c hosts both).
>
> Which can be pretty confusing though (in my opinion that is) ... but whatever,
> I will incorporate it into c550 then.

I agree. Can't you rename the c550.c into loox.c then?
I completely agree with everything Anton said,
only for decoration (alignment of "=" symbols) I suggest to use spaces.
Let's keep tabs for indentation, as their width can change from editor to
editor.

regards
Philipp
Received on Thu Dec 13 2007 - 13:25:30 EST

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Thu Dec 13 2007 - 13:26:00 EST