On Thu, 1 Sep 2005, Adam Pribyl wrote:
> 2.6.13 has now option to set kernel ticks timer - I'd really like to see
> if that makes a difference to set 100Hz instead 1000Hz, as 2.6.12 really
> seems to suck battery faster than 2.4.
Hm... I am probably bit wrong - this seems to be only for x86.:(
How's that for ARM?!
Adam Pribyl
Received on Thu Sep 01 2005 - 05:02:18 EDT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Thu Sep 01 2005 - 05:02:31 EDT