I haven't looked at this yet, but it raises an interesting point:
Does jffs2 compressed -O2 compiled executable take up more or less room than
jffs2 compressed -Os compiled executables?
I'll have to play with a bunch of different programs.
Question:
Does ls -al in jffs2 report the size of the program compressed or
uncompressed?
(I assume compressed, but you never know...)
On Monday 11 June 2001 06:08, David Woodhouse wrote:
> edwardam@home.com said:
> > In the programs I've compiled for the iPAQ I've seen anywhere from
> > 10% to 20% size reductions (usually around 10%, but 10% across 16 MB
> > is 1.6 MB ... :-)
>
> Have you compared the compressed size of the executables? Purely
> conjecture, but I suspect stuff like unrolled loops might compress
> reasonably well anyway. :)
>
> --
> dwmw2
-- Edward Muller - edwardam@home.com - edwardam@handhelds.org Grow a ponytail -- view it as your telepathic antenna to other Linux Kernel Developers. -- Jeff V. MerkeyReceived on Mon Jun 11 18:58:20 2001
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Tue May 04 2004 - 09:44:01 EDT