RE: [iPAQ] Bootldr-2.13.2 problem

Guess I'll have to use the c000 version twice: Once a week ago, and once
again when my iPaq returns from Cambridge.
You should simply not do things in a hurry. And the ability to read helps
to. I'll try again.

Stefan

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ken Causey [mailto:nikos@handhelds.org]
> Sent: Wednesday, April 18, 2001 11:58 AM
> To: Stefan Okrongli; ipaq@handhelds.org
> Subject: Re: [iPAQ] Bootldr-2.13.2 problem
>
>
> Stefan,
>
> Please examine the instructions at
> ftp://ftp.handhelds.org/pub/linux/compaq/ipaq/v0.20/install.html very
> closely. The filenames are not all going to be exactly right,
> but you will
> note that the c000 bootloader is only loaded into RAM once by osloader, it
> is then used to FLASH the 0000 bootldr into FLASHROM. These must each be
> used in exactly the right spots. In theory you will only ever
> use the c000
> bootldr once, once you have a working 0000 bootldr in flash, you will be
> able to flash new bootldrs into flash at any time.
>
> Ken Causey (nikos)
>
> At 11:06 AM 4/18/01 -0500, Stefan Okrongli wrote:
> >Hi,
> >
> >After much deliberation I decided to try the 2.13.2 bootloader,
> and flashed
> >it onto the iPaq (previously used bootldr-2.10.5, used HyperTerm
> on Win2k to
> >xmodem). After that I go the same error message as John D.
> Rowell got with
> >the 2.12.0 bootloader on April 05. The boot output on the
> terminal after a
> >reset is:
> >
> >DABT
> >0000084C
> >FFFFFFFF
> >
> >Reset with action button produces the exact same output as
> decribed in John
> >D. Rowell's mail.
> >I am not absolutely certain though if I send 'bootldr-c000-2.13.2' or
> >'bootldr-0000-2.13.2'. What is the difference between those
> files, and if my
> >iPaq died due the wrong file, shouldn't they have names that distinguish
> >them from each other in a better way?
> >
> >I'll have to say bye bye to my dear iPaq, and send it to
> Cambridge. Sniff.
> >
> >Stefan
> >
>
Received on Wed Apr 18 10:04:50 2001