Re: [iPAQ] 2210 or 4150, which one has better chance for full hardware support?

From: Michael Opdenacker <zumbi3.a.t.free.fr>
Date: Wed Mar 31 2004 - 04:54:19 EST

Hi Frantisek,

I can't really tell for h4xxx, but h22xx is progressing pretty quickly.

Here's what already works: pcmcia, lcd and usb.
Here's what's starting to work (no thoroughly tested yet): flash access
(at least read), LEDs, touchscreen, sound.
Here's what we still need to work on: mmc/sd (got specs), bluetooth
(some specs), power management (got specs), bootloader, battery
interface, Linux 2.6 device drivers (make sure most peripherals are
supported).

So, h22xx should have everything you need within 3 months, or hopefully
earlier.

Why don't you by a h2210 and join the porting team?

    Having you on board would be great!

    :-)

    Michael.

> Hello,
>
> I just flashed PPC2002 back to my 3870 and sold it. It was a nice
> linux PDA but after getting used to my Tungsten T2 (my second PDA,
> which replaced my aging M500 on a position of 100% useful and rock
> solid PDA :-), I couldn't stand the washed dim screen of 3870 model
> anymore.
>
> As I really like running powerful OS on PDA, I think about my next PDA
> for linux.
>
> I understand both 2210 or 4150 are not ready yet, but which one has
> better chance for full hardware support?
>
> I like 4150 more, but isn't 4150 in the same situation like 39x0 and
> 191x units, i.e. without any documentation and almost zero chance of
> working SD/MMC slot? Or is 4150 fully documented like 2210?
>
> Thanks for your comments.
>
> Frantisek
> _______________________________________________
> Open Source Software for Compaq iPAQ Handhelds.
> iPAQ mailing list
> iPAQ@handhelds.org
> https://handhelds.org/mailman/listinfo/ipaq
> irc://irc.openprojects.net #ipaq
>
>

-- 
Michael Opdenacker
http://opdenacker.org/
Received on Wed Mar 31 09:54:31 2004

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Tue May 04 2004 - 09:45:09 EDT