On 10-Mar-2003, Philip Blundell wrote:
>Historically, having one version of a library in /usr/local and an older
>one in /usr seems to be a recipe for confusion: you have to be very
>careful with paths to make everything work out right.
Yeah: according to my tests, GCC get includes from /usr/local/include by
default, but it doesn't get libs from /usr/local/lib by default.
>Maybe we could download the Debian source for gtk 2.2, build it on a
>"testing" system, and install the resulting debs, thus gaining gtk 2.2
>in /usr without the need for libc 2.3.
That's fine with me, but is anyone relying on gtk 2.0 on the cluster?
Probably not, but I'm CCing to ipaq@handhelds.org to give people a chance
to comment. If nobody objects by the end of Wednesday, I'll install gtk
2.2 in /usr on the iPAQs.
Nick
Received on Mon Mar 10 15:11:10 2003
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Tue May 04 2004 - 09:45:01 EDT