Re: [iPAQ] FLTK, NanoX and Microwindows?

From: David Woodhouse <dwmw2.a.t.infradead.org>
Date: Tue Oct 24 2000 - 05:34:39 EDT

afalout@xtra.co.nz said:
> (BTW, why does REPLY result with only original poster's email
> address, instead with this list's address? I would expect people are
> encouraged to reply to the list, not each other?)

http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html

--
dwmw2

Received on Tue Oct 24 02:28:51 2000

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Erik Mouw: "Re: [iPAQ] FLTK, NanoX and Microwindows?"
Previous message: Yves Vanlerberghe (ETM): "[iPAQ] Howto v.17"
In reply to: Andrej Falout: "RE: [iPAQ] FLTK, NanoX and Microwindows?"
Next in thread: Andrej Falout: "RE: [iPAQ] Reply to harmful (was: FLTK, NanoX and Microwindows? )"
Reply: Andrej Falout: "RE: [iPAQ] Reply to harmful (was: FLTK, NanoX and Microwindows? )"

Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]
Contemporary messages sorted: [ By Date ] [ By Thread ] [ By Subject ] [ By Author ] [ By messages with attachments ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Tue May 04 2004 - 09:43:44 EDT