Very odd, after leaving things overnight and going back to the
iPAQ that wasn't playing initially with the CF+BT sleeve
setserial /dev/tts/0 baud_base 1000000
hciattach /dev/tts/0 bcsp 230400
now works fine........
bnep, pand etc all work too to give a network connection.
Does the chip need a little while to settle down after pskey is used on
it?
Des Johnston
================================================================
On Wed, 30 Oct 2002, Des Johnston wrote:
>
> Using the bluez packages from unstable on top of 0.6
> I have one 3630 iPAQ that will work with the (same) CF+BT sleeve
> in bcsp mode and another which flatly refuses. In both cases
> the commands used are:
>
> setserial /dev/tts/0 baud_base 1000000
> hciattach /dev/tts/0 bcsp 230400
>
> On the working iPAQ hciattach gives a timeout without the setserial first.
>
> I get various hci_ errors on the non-compliant iPAQ (I'll post
> them once I get it by me again). It's probably not relevant but the
> working iPAQ was a 0.5.3 upgrade and the sulking one a fresh 0.6 install.
>
>
> Des Johnston
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> >Use the bluez packages from the unstable feed.
>
> >hciattach is not broken - the version of hcitattach in 0.6 doesn't
> >support BCSP.
>
> >Upgrade.
Received on Wed Oct 30 22:08:58 2002
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Tue May 04 2004 - 09:44:58 EDT