Re: [iPAQ] 3900 series status?

From: Alan Cox <alan.a.t.lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Date: Thu Jul 11 2002 - 11:34:25 EDT

> of the base parts of the standard distribution for both StrongArm and
> Xscale (libc is probably the most important part). If we can add in Qt
> & X to the optimized mix, we should see good performance.

Are Xscale CPU's available yet where the MMU works in writeback cache mode ?
Received on Thu Jul 11 15:21:07 2002

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Nicolas Pitre: "Re: [iPAQ] 3900 series status?"
Previous message: Nils Faerber: "[iPAQ] 3870 resume delay, recent CVS kernel"
In reply to: Christian, Andrew: "RE: [iPAQ] 3900 series status?"
Next in thread: Nicolas Pitre: "Re: [iPAQ] 3900 series status?"
Reply: Nicolas Pitre: "Re: [iPAQ] 3900 series status?"

Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]
Contemporary messages sorted: [ By Date ] [ By Thread ] [ By Subject ] [ By Author ] [ By messages with attachments ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Tue May 04 2004 - 09:44:53 EDT