RE: [iPAQ] New x86 to ARM cross tool chain available

I used the following for the new compiler toolchain:
gcc 3.0.4
glibc 2.2.5
binutils 2.12

Works perfectly fine on all ARM applications.

I have also built stripped down libraries for putting on the iPaq. I get slightly increased performance compared to 2.95.3

- Sri

-----Original Message-----
From: Emmanuel Blot [mailto:emmanuel.blot@free.fr]
Sent: Friday, June 07, 2002 7:28 AM
To: Mave Rick; Emmanuel Blot
Cc: pb@nexus.co.uk; Subramanian Sridharan-rat701; Russell King (E-mail);
Erik Mouw (E-mail); ipaq@handhelds.org; Jamey Hicks (E-mail)
Subject: Re: [iPAQ] New x86 to ARM cross tool chain available

Unfortunely, I did not write down the problems I encountered, and I forgot 8'(
I moved back to 2.2.4 and as everything went fine, I gave up with 2.2.5

Sorry about this.

Manu.

----- Original Message -----
From: "Mave Rick" <TheMaverickMind@netscape.net>
To: "Emmanuel Blot" <emmanuel.blot@anciens.enib.fr>
Cc: <pb@nexus.co.uk>; "Subramanian Sridharan-rat701" <Sridharan.Subramanian@motorola.com>;
"Russell King (E-mail)" <rmk@arm.linux.org.uk>; "Erik Mouw (E-mail)"
<J.A.K.Mouw@its.tudelft.nl>; <ipaq@handhelds.org>; "Jamey Hicks (E-mail)" <Jamey.Hicks@hp.com>
Sent: Friday, June 07, 2002 11:34 AM
Subject: Re: [iPAQ] New x86 to ARM cross tool chain available

> hi,
>
> i did manage to compile 3.0.4 with 2.2.5 some time back. however some
> programs compiled in < 2.2.4 were unable to work with 2.2.5. so i
> reverted back to 2.2.4
>
> what sort of issues did u have?
>
> MR
>
> emmanuel.blot@free.fr wrote:
>
> >>which glibc version is recommended fr gcc-3.1? is glibc-2.2.5 ok?
> >>
> >
> > I recompiled the 3.0.4 some weeks ago for ARM, and I got issues with 2.2.5. I had to revert
back
> > to 2.2.4 that compiles fine with gcc 3.0.4
> > I would be interested to know if someone managed to recompile succesfully glibc 2.2.5 with
gcc
> > 3.0.4 on ARM... (or with 3.1)
> >
> > Manu.
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
Received on Fri Jun 07 15:33:49 2002