talking about the new usb driver submited to 2.5.8 kernel source tree,
Stuart Lynne wrote:
> In article <1018999655.3437@whiskey.enposte.net>,
> The network function is compatible with a commercial Windows driver
> available from MCCI. This is important because few commercial products
> will ship without a compatible Windows driver being available.
>
does this mean Linux kernel tree must be adapted to commercial drivers
for Windows ?
Shouldn't that be the windows drivers to be adapted to existing Linux
drivers which seems to work fine (at least with a Linux host) ?
More general question (that's why I include handhelds.org & qpe-devel
mailing lists) : is a Windows driver for actual usb-eth driver of any
interest for linux-arm community ?
Eric
Received on Wed Apr 17 09:47:05 2002
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Tue May 04 2004 - 09:44:46 EDT