Re: [iPAQ] Re: What's in a name? :-)

Tom_Kirksey@ingersoll-rand.com wrote:
>
> I kicked "LiPaq" around a while back. Nobody seemed too thrilled by the
> name at the time. Maybe we need a poll to decide on a good name.
>
> xPaq, LiPaq, lPaq, linPaq, etc......

linPaq sounds like a benchmark.

liPaq is nice, if you say it with a long "i" (lye-pack), because it kind
of "embraces and extends" the "iPaq" name, as would be appropriate. :)

Don't say it with a short "i" though, then it sounds like lip-ack.
"What's that on your face?" "Ugh, it's lip-ack!"

-- 
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
With Microsoft products, failure is not           Derek Glidden
an option - it's a standard component.      http://3dlinux.org/
Choose your life.  Choose your            http://www.tbcpc.org/
future.  Choose Linux.              http://www.illusionary.com/