On Mon, Feb 04, 2002 at 03:32:46PM +0100, jrlpop@mail.portland.co.uk wrote:
>
> I'm reasonably sure nothing else important was different in the two
> install sessions. I notice someone has changed ipkg to use /bin/sh
> instead of /bin/ash now, so maybe this is an ash problem?
I think what it comes down to are the ways the respective shells cope
with the situation of lacking a current working directory. There's
definitely a bug somplace, bash is just dealing with it better.
Alexander
Received on Mon Feb 4 11:24:41 2002
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Tue May 04 2004 - 09:44:28 EDT