> Sender: linux-admin@handhelds.org
> From: "Muller, Edward" <emuller@painewebber.com>
> Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2000 15:28:55 -0400
> To: "'jg@pa.dec.com'" <jg@pa.dec.com>, Jim Pick <jim@pocketlinux.com>
> Cc: Andre Schroeter <A.Schroeter@dkfz-heidelberg.de>, linux@handhelds.org,
> ipaq@handhelds.org
> Subject: RE: [Linux] pocketlinux
> -----
> I played around with Pocketlinux for about 1/2 an hour over the
> weekend...Looks like it has a lot of promise....
>
> One of the things I noticed is that they have init (or something else, but
> most likely init) run pppd....This simplifies a ppp setup, but means you
> can't get a serial connection to the ipaq....
>
> Does their X implimentation of Java really run that much faster under X?
>
Dunno how their Java implementation runs. I do know that the TinyX
implementation is VERY fast on the machine, as fast or faster than the
old style frame buffer implementations.
So when I played with PocketLinux, it felt glacial to me (sort of like WinCE's
lame performance); about the way a lame frame buffer implementation would
work.
I'll be getting some full performance numbers sometime soon for
the iPAQ's X performance.
- Jim
-- Jim Gettys Technology and Corporate Development Compaq Computer Corporation jg@pa.dec.comReceived on Mon Aug 21 13:26:46 2000
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Tue May 04 2004 - 09:43:40 EDT