On Thu, 2005-02-03 at 20:58 +0100, Michael Opdenacker wrote:
> Well, that would result in an ugly and difficult to understand macro...
> I'm not sure it's worth the effort.
Agreed. I don't think we should worry about this for the moment, at
least. Someone else can always implement that optimisation in the
future if they need it.
> What about continuing this discussion on the kernel-mailing list, as
> several projects are impacted? I can take care of summarizing what we've
> said so far.
Good idea. Please go ahead.
p.
Received on Thu Feb 03 2005 - 15:16:16 EST
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Mon Jul 25 2005 - 17:21:03 EDT