Re: Latest haret on h1940?

From: Kevin O'Connor <kevin_at_koconnor.net>
Date: Sun, 28 Jan 2007 12:00:02 -0500

On Sun, Jan 28, 2007 at 06:39:27PM +0200, Paul Sokolovsky wrote:
> However, we'll still face cases where one oem string is substring of
> another. I'd prefer not to bother with detection order, but to add
> more flexible detection methods. Towards this, I have patch for
> Machine::detect() -> Machine::detect(wcher_t *oemstring).

How will that help? I'd rather not propagate the strcmp to so many
different places.

-Kevin
Received on Sun Jan 28 2007 - 12:00:16 EST

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Sun Jan 28 2007 - 12:00:29 EST