Re: Why not Solaris on an iPAQ?

From: Erik Mouw <J.A.K.Mouw.a.t.ITS.TUDelft.NL>
Date: Sat Jan 20 2001 - 09:39:17 EST

On Sat, Jan 20, 2001 at 09:11:47AM -0500, William Staniewicz wrote:
> I am curious why there seems to be no interest
> or effort made to putting Solaris on an iPAQ or
> similar SA1100 device.

Simply because it is not cool. This might sound like a joke, but I'm
serious. Why are *BSD and Linux so popular? Because they are developed
in an open way by a bunch of committed hackers. Now compare that with
Solaris...

Another issue might be the Sun source license, which is not considered
compatible with the Open Source guidelines.

> Sun does have the ChorusOS and a quick look at
> the documentation seems to imply that 3.2/3.4
> supports StrongArm but maybe I am reading it
> wrong. Would Chorus be useful on an iPAQ?

Hmm, as far as I can read in the FAQ for ChorusOS 4.0 it only supports
ix86, UltraSparc and PowerPC targets.

Erik

-- 
J.A.K. (Erik) Mouw, Information and Communication Theory Group, Department
of Electrical Engineering, Faculty of Information Technology and Systems,
Delft University of Technology, PO BOX 5031,  2600 GA Delft, The Netherlands
Phone: +31-15-2783635  Fax: +31-15-2781843  Email: J.A.K.Mouw@its.tudelft.nl
WWW: http://www-ict.its.tudelft.nl/~erik/
Received on Sat Jan 20 06:25:21 2001

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Tue May 04 2004 - 09:42:21 EDT