Shane NAy wrote:
: 512 byte eraseblocks on flash is like..., non-existant :-). That's
: actually one of the majory problems with r/w flash. Eraseblocks of
: flash are more in the realm of 64 or 128kbit. (Agenda's use 128kbit
: eraseblocks)
(Bits or bytes?)
Ah, checked some specs of block-mapped (NAND) flashes from Samsung. Writes
had to be made with disk-like 528 byte blocks, but erases were 16k - I'm
happy we don't use this kind of flash, even jffs would make large amounts
of page erases when doing only small changes...
Personally I've used ext2 on flash for now - but with extreme suspicion.
How many flash erases I generate with single chmod? At least one. How many
with small change to shell script? Several I guess. And those updates are
concentrated on certain pages, probably. Thus I use flash only to store
what must be stored on flash.
-kirma
Received on Tue Dec 19 2000 - 01:42:48 EST
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Mon Jul 25 2005 - 17:20:41 EDT