I saw a message* on linux-arm-kernel and followed up on it with the poster
(see forwarded message below)
*
http://lists.arm.linux.org.uk/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2005-February/027142.html
Relevant patches:
http://svn.rungie.com/svn/gumstix-buildroot/trunk/sources/kernel-patches/000-gumstix-hwuart.patch
http://svn.rungie.com/svn/gumstix-buildroot/trunk/sources/kernel-patches/000-gumstix-pxa255-gpio-count-bugfix.patch
http://svn.rungie.com/svn/gumstix-buildroot/trunk/sources/kernel-patches/200-gumstix-bugfix-pxa-serial-mctrl.patch
http://svn.rungie.com/svn/gumstix-buildroot/trunk/sources/kernel-patches/200-gumstix-bugfix-serial-interrupt.patch
http://svn.rungie.com/svn/gumstix-buildroot/trunk/sources/kernel-patches/200-gumstix-bugfix-serial-register-status.patch
Can someone who knows serial say whether we should commit these patches to
hh.o, eithier for 2.4 or 2.6?
Matt
---------- Forwarded Message ----------
Subject: Re: pxa & other serial handshake bug
Date: Friday 11 March 2005 10:52 am
From: David Farrell <davidjf2001_at_yahoo.com>
To: Matthew Reimer <mreimer_at_vpop.net>
Matt,
I did not get any response from the list, I guess
no-one is using hardware handshaking.
I was working with Craig Hughes on the gumstix
platform. You really want to visit Craigs URL
below. You may also want to review the mail
list.
Craig has several patches relating to PXA255 and
luez with the Infineon Bluetooth Part.
The status now is 921K baud on the HWUART with
intel autoflow hardware handshaking used. The
BTUART would not run at this speed.
http://svn.rungie.com/svn/gumstix-buildroot/trunk/sources/
kernel-patches/200-gumstix-bugfix-serial-register-status.patch
--- Matthew Reimer <mreimer_at_vpop.net> wrote:
> David,
>
> I saw your post "pxa & other serial handshake
> bug" to linux-arm-kernel. Have
> you received any responses? Would you send me a
> copy of your patch? I'm
> trying to debug a bluetooth problem on h2200
> and am wondering if your patch
> might help us.
>
> Thanks for any help you can give.
>
> Matt
-------------------------------------------------------
Received on Fri Mar 11 2005 - 14:17:47 EST
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Mon Jul 25 2005 - 17:20:11 EDT