Re: pflash parameters

On Fri, Nov 12, 2004 at 02:53:10PM -0500, Jamey Hicks wrote:
> Erik Hovland wrote:
>
> >On Fri, Nov 12, 2004 at 07:31:23PM +0100, Lluis Pérez Vidal wrote:
> >
> >
> >>Michel Stempin says that I should write
> >>
> >>pflash 0x40000 0xffff 0
> >>
> >>
> >
> >To unprotect flash memory. The portion of flash memory that bootldr is
> >sitting in. That is why the value for the upper address is so small.
> >
> >
> >
> The unprotect command actually unprotects all of flash because that is
> how intel flash protection bits work.

Thank you for the correction!

E

-- 
Erik Hovland
mail: erik AT hovland DOT org
web: http://hovland.org/
PGP/GPG public key available on request