Erik Hovland wrote:
>On Fri, Nov 12, 2004 at 07:31:23PM +0100, Lluis Pérez Vidal wrote:
>
>
>>Michel Stempin says that I should write
>>
>>pflash 0x40000 0xffff 0
>>
>>
>
>To unprotect flash memory. The portion of flash memory that bootldr is
>sitting in. That is why the value for the upper address is so small.
>
>
>
The unprotect command actually unprotects all of flash because that is
how intel flash protection bits work.
Jamey
Received on Fri Nov 12 14:53:16 2004
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Fri Nov 12 2004 - 14:53:46 EST