Re: Re: Manual installation (was ramdisk rescue installation)

From: Bram Neijt <bneijt_at_gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 8 Dec 2006 00:35:34 +0100

First and above all, thanks for the reply and links.

On 12/7/06, Paul Sokolovsky <pmiscml_at_gmail.com> wrote:
> Let me hint you that it's not of much use - just imagine if everyone
> took some random binary snapshot, applied random changes, and offered
> everyone else to use it. Chaos would ensue! So, there's an effort to
> create reproducible and supportable distro images for h4000, and I
> encourage you to join with this effort, not try to make it in "your
> own" way. If you're interested, please start with reading h4000 wiki -
> I may assure you, if you would follow its instructions from the
> beginning, you very likely wouldn't face problems at all (or if you
> would, with effort you put into this, we'd have current h4000's image
> improved now, not old h2200's one). YMMV.

Rest assurred, I'm not going to fork any work.

To summarize what happened: I tried the ramdisk rescue approach (which
you state works for most people) and for some reason it didn't work
for me. This was my earlier post. As a reply to this post, Marcus told
me my SD card was probably a weird one and wanted more information.
Knowing that it was not my SD card I decided to do it the manual way I
got working earlier.
However, I found that most of the Manual part (like compiling the
kernel etc.) had been taken out of the wiki, so I was faced with
finding my own solutions and used various parts of the wiki in various
places and got it to work.

If it would only confuse people, then I won't post my image. I might
try the special familier distribution in the future, but as things are
working again with the new kernel, I might just keep working with this
one.

Thanks and greets,
  Bram
Received on Thu Dec 07 2006 - 18:35:39 EST

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Thu Dec 07 2006 - 18:35:54 EST