Re: 2.6.21-hh16 on h2200

From: Gerhard Zintel <Gerhard.Zintel_at_mrs-thomas.de>
Date: Sun, 16 Sep 2007 23:18:28 +0200

Hello Michal,

nice to hear something from U 2!

I was not available the last 5 weeks - a very long holiday trip.

Now I have nearly no glue what's going on. I have the feeling you are more
inside the discussion and can explain to me why there is absolutely no
discussion on the kernel-developer list for a long time. Below your message
sound as it is due to maintanance. But maintenance for such a long time???

I've tested the LED patch from Alain and it works well. I'm very happy that at
least this item is solved. I'd like to send it to Paul (in the name of
Alain - sure) but now I'm a bit annoyed if to send it to the list or to Paul
directly? Ah I just see, you mentioned it below, kernel-bugs seems to be the
intermediate place for it.

More later on

Gerhard

On Freitag, 14. September 2007, you wrote:
> Hello Alain
>
> It would lie if I wrote that "we" have been struggling to solve it on
> kernel-discuss list for some time - actually it was Gerhard who spent
> his time on it. Anyway - I am very glad that You have solved the
> charging led problem :) I would just like to see Paul's comment if it
> is ok in the structural meaning....
> Could I ask You for a favour ? There are many problems with the kernel
> - some get solved, some still exist and are just not revealed (yet!),
> some come back as boomerang from solved to bugs:( There is a grate
> need for an universal, formal test procedure - how to test the kernel
> (not the apps) for such bugs - catch them and make a clear report.
> Could You fill in the wiki page that I have created
> (http://www.handhelds.org/moin/moin.cgi/QATestProcedure) with the
> procedure how You have tested the leds? In my opinion that is the best
> situation - when You are still working on it, and not after a week or
> a month after - when You forget most of details.
> To edit the wiki You must first register Yourself and login. Write
> anything (or everything) that You made to test the result - don't
> worry too much on formatting and placement of text on the page - I can
> handle that. I, and many developers would be very grateful for that.
> An example of such procedure can be found at
> http://pdalinux-tests.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/*checkout*/pdalinux-tests/
>trunk/testcases.html
>
> Gerhard - I started writing this email to let You know that someone
> managed to solve the led problem - but now I see that You were faster
> than me. Nice to know that You are around - I have not heard from You
> for long time - I guess since since the kernel-discuss went down
> (George - please bring it back to life..... pls). I have asked Paul
> Sokolovsky about the list yesterday and he wrote to use kernel-bugs as
> a temporary place to patches to kernel cvs tree (and CC him the patch
> - just in case...) - that goes to You, Alain too.
> Gerhard, maybe a bit off topic - would You like to try playing with
> Angstrom (or OpenMoko - I don't know yet) a bit on h2200 and some of
> its cool features like kinetic scrolling (the one that everybody goes
> crazy these days.....:P ) ?
> See
> http://dominion.kabel.utwente.nl/koen/cms/kinetic-scrolling-on-the-neo1973
> http://wiki.openmoko.org/wiki/FAQ#Q:_Does_OpenMoko_run_on_any_other_hardwar
>e.3F http://dominion.kabel.utwente.nl/koen/cms/openmoko-running-on-an-ipaq
> If it can run on hx4700, motorola a780, regular PC why shouldn't it run on
> h2200 ?
>
> As it goes for i2c-pxa missing in angstrom build - I have spotted that
> OE treats "needed" modules differently that Familiar. I think the best
> place to ask why and who to solve the i2c-pxa problem are the OE
> mailing lists.
>
>
> Anyway - it is nice to see some interesting moves on h2200 mailing
> list - the summer was dead season on h2200 subject (and hh.org in
> general - I guess - [well - maybe not for George France -working hard
> on Server Maintenance and Upgrades - we are keeping our fingers
> crossed for good results:) ]) - in opposite to OE, OpenMoko and
> OpenEZX.
>
>
> Cheers
> Michal
Received on Sun Sep 16 2007 - 17:32:24 EDT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Sun Sep 16 2007 - 17:32:47 EDT