On 1/11/07, Dmitry Artamonow <mad_soft_at_inbox.ru> wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 10, 2007 at 02:03:03PM +0200, Paul Sokolovsky wrote:
> > Hello Dmitry,
> >
> > Tuesday, January 9, 2007, 6:54:53 PM, you wrote:
>
> [skip]
>
> > > Also there's a compilation problem with h2200_leds, but seems that it
> > > requires some major refactoring and rewriting to new leds API.
> >
> > Well, Matt Reimer told there should be implementation per new API
> > already. And either way, it's not that major ;-). If you could look
> > into this, that would be appreciated!
>
> I there's a new implementation, perhaps it was never commited.
> I didn't found a trace of it in CVS - there's only good old
> drivers/leds/h2200_leds.c which doesn't compiles anymore.
> And I don't feel brave enough to rewrite driver myself. As an example I
> looked on drivers/leds/leds-locomo.c (New API) and drivers/leds/locomo.c
> (old API) and difference is too complicated for my poor mind.
> (BTW, what is the reason drivers/leds/locomo.c still in CVS?)
>
> Any comments from Matt?
Yes, h2200_leds.c is a first draft of using the new API, but it hasn't
been updated as the API has changed. I do hope to finish that when I
get another board for testing.
Matt
Received on Thu Jan 11 2007 - 13:31:28 EST
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Thu Jan 11 2007 - 13:31:44 EST