Re: shamcop adc

From: Alain2210 <alain2210_at_free.fr>
Date: Wed, 3 Mar 2004 15:24:58 +0100

Selon Phil Blundell <pb_at_nexus.co.uk>:

> On Tue, 2004-03-02 at 18:02, Alain2210 wrote:
> > I have tried again, with this and the original shamcop_base.c (but with
> the
> > corrected typo), I
> > do that I get a kernel oops when shamcop ts is registered by shamcop_adc.c
> > (since it does
> > not have parent).
>
> Right, but why does it not have a parent? That's the bit that I'm still
> not grasping. Maybe you should add some more instrumentation to the
> code to find out what's going wrong.

I'm trying to understand that. So, could you help me : when
shamcop_adc_probe (struct device *dev)
is called where is defined the value of dev ? I have not understood a basic thing.

Thanks,

Alain
Received on Wed Mar 03 2004 - 14:25:00 EST

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Mon Jul 25 2005 - 17:19:25 EDT