Re: shamcop adc

On Tue, 2004-03-02 at 18:02, Alain2210 wrote:
> I have tried again, with this and the original shamcop_base.c (but with the
> corrected typo), I
> do that I get a kernel oops when shamcop ts is registered by shamcop_adc.c
> (since it does
> not have parent).

Right, but why does it not have a parent? That's the bit that I'm still
not grasping. Maybe you should add some more instrumentation to the
code to find out what's going wrong.

p.
Received on Tue Mar 02 2004 - 18:09:40 EST