Thanks Phil!
I checked that the destination MAC address is correct from the host side.
Well, no progress yet today on this topic. However, I still have work to
do: use the "gadget zero" module for testing USB gadget support.
To be continued. Don't hesitate to make your own experiments!
I copy some of you directly as the mail server seems to be down...
:-)
Michael.
>On Tue, 2004-02-24 at 22:11, Michael Opdenacker wrote:
>
>
>>22:57:04.101789 arp who-has 192.168.0.201 tell 192.168.0.200
>>22:57:05.101226 arp who-has 192.168.0.201 tell 192.168.0.200
>>22:57:05.120230 arp reply 192.168.0.201 is-at 3e:3a:93:d7:3b:f0
>>22:57:05.121221 arp reply 192.168.0.201 is-at 3e:3a:93:d7:3b:f0
>>... (the same sequence starts again).
>>
>>It seems that the PC doesn't know where to reply to... I guess there
>>should be an IP address instead of "3e:3a:93:d7:3b:f0"
>>
>>
>
>No, that looks OK. ARP is the protocol which translates IP addresses
>into MAC addresses. So, assuming that 3e:3a:93:d7:3b:f0 really is the
>MAC that your host has picked for its usb0 interface, everything would
>seem to be in order at that end. You could enable the -e option on
>tcpdump to check that the destination MAC is also correct.
>
>p.
>
>
>
>
>
-- Michael Opdenacker http://opdenacker.org/Received on Wed Feb 25 2004 - 16:43:46 EST
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Mon Jul 25 2005 - 17:19:25 EDT