Hi Lau,
Great work! I'm very please that you could achieve this level of accuracy!
> 2: End user calibration: An affine transformation is applied to the
> output of the linearization. This transformation will compensate for
> variation among individual IPaqs.
I hope this can be handled by the standard user calibration tools. We
will test this!
>
> A second order model is almost as good (3.7 and 2.2 pixels average
> errors), and practical experiments are neeed to determine if 3rd order
> is worth the extra CPU cycles:
Right! We will have to see, for example with an on-screen drawing
program. However, I don't think that 8 extra floating point
multiplications will be too hard to handle...
>
> These transformations should create points (a, b) in screen coordinates.
>
> If a more elaborate model is required, we will probably need an even
> better data set. It would be very interesting to see multiple
> "harvests" from the same IPaq. Then it would be possible to
> distinguish noise from "real" nonlineraity.
Good! I'll send you 1 or 2 more samples when I can. Other multiples from
other iPAQs are welcome, of course...
>
> Any volunteers for creating a test implementation in the driver?
I can take care of this.
This will also be a good way of testing the new 2.6.6 handhelds.org
kernel... I hope it doesn't break usb networking.
Thanks again for everything!
:-)
Michael.
-- Michael Opdenacker http://opdenacker.org/Received on Tue May 18 2004 - 08:48:55 EDT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Mon Jul 25 2005 - 17:19:27 EDT