On Tue, Jun 12, 2001 at 03:06:30PM -0700, Jim Gettys wrote:
> Recent experience is that optimizing for size often *improves* performance,
> due to better cache behavior. Presuming memory is free is now a major
> fallicy in programming. It is generally very expensive to touch, in terms
> of cycles.
Sure, but apparently the kernel is the exception on the rule. Which was
to be expected, though: the kernel already contains performance
optimised code.
Erik
[who still has to run that -Os optimised kernel]
-- J.A.K. (Erik) Mouw, Information and Communication Theory Group, Department of Electrical Engineering, Faculty of Information Technology and Systems, Delft University of Technology, PO BOX 5031, 2600 GA Delft, The Netherlands Phone: +31-15-2783635 Fax: +31-15-2781843 Email: J.A.K.Mouw_at_its.tudelft.nl WWW: http://www-ict.its.tudelft.nl/~erik/Received on Tue Jun 12 2001 - 16:44:16 EDT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Mon Jul 25 2005 - 17:12:27 EDT