Re: Menu

From: Carl Worth <cworth_at_east.isi.edu>
Date: Tue, 8 May 2001 13:48:05 -0400

Jim Gettys writes:
> Carl,
>
> There is a new standard for this (not written down) shared by the
> KDE and Gnome folks.
>
> I recommend we follow this convention unless we have good reason....
> - Jim

Jim,

I was planning on using Debian's menu so that we could reduce the
munging necessary for converting existing .debs. But, more and more
these days I'm realizing that I may be creating a monster rather than
just a small tweak of Debian. *sigh*

I'm fine with any reasonable system. I just checked Debian's menu and
the two binaries it provides don't meet this criterion, (300KB and
600KB)[1]. :( The actual format of the menu seems reasonable
though. Nothing that couldn't be turned into a blackbox menu with 1KB
or less of sh+sed magic.

I'd be glad to look into the KDE/Gnome system. Any recommendation on
where I could find more details? or should I just try installing
one of these and poke around?

-Carl

[1] This system includes code to balance the branching factor of
subtrees as much as possible. Cute. But certainly something we can
live without given our space constraints.

-- 
Carl Worth                                        
USC Information Sciences Institute                 cworth_at_east.isi.edu
4350 N. Fairfax Dr. #770, Arlington VA 22203	          703-812-3725
Received on Tue May 08 2001 - 10:49:12 EDT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Mon Jul 25 2005 - 17:12:23 EDT