Re: Fam V9 Buildsystem Choices

From: Erik Hovland <erik_at_hovland.org>
Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2006 15:10:57 -0700

On Sun, Jul 23, 2006 at 04:36:26PM -0700, nigel wrote:
> i am wondering if a decision has been reached yet for Familiar V9?

No decision has been made. In fact I would say that even option 3 in
your list is a possibility.

> Currently i see a few options, but no clear direction for V9.
> 1-Currrent OE/Bitbake
> 2-Forked Legacy OE/Bitbake which keeps support for all the 0.8x images ( for other projects/end-user compiles ) incase someone cannot switch for various reasons ( propietary device support - scanners, POS, etc )
> 3-Other which would require a lot of transitioning.
>
> i am asking this as i would like to start tinkering with getting an image to build for the Audiovox ppc6600 smartphone and ideally (providing i've enough time on my part) to include it as a device for V9 release.

I am sure that if you started spitting out patches for familiar support
we would start doing our best to fit them into whatever we will choose.

E

-- 
Erik Hovland
mail: erik AT hovland DOT org
web: http://hovland.org/
PGP/GPG public key available on request
Received on Thu Jul 27 2006 - 18:11:01 EDT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Thu Jul 27 2006 - 18:11:07 EDT