Re: Familiar 0.9: target kernel

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Patrick Ohly wrote:
> On Sat, 2005-06-11 at 21:56 +0200, Rene Wagner wrote:
>
>>The latest tagged and tested code from handhelds.org CVS I guess.
>>Obviously, that requires someone to have the time and hardware
>>to do the testing of such an OE-built kernel.
>
>
> I have an iPAQ 3970 and can test the kernel for 0.8.3.
>
>
>>>If it is the latest handhelds-sa kernel (-hh40),
>>>shouldn't h3900.conf set
>>> PREFERRED_PROVIDER_virtual/kernel = "handhelds-sa"
>>>?
>>
>>What makes you bevieve an sa kernel would be any good for
>>pxa machines?
>
>
> The fact that you mentioned fixes done for -sa while I had
> problems with the -pxa versions made me wonder whether I
> was compiling the right kernel. I assume "sa" stands for
> StrongARM, but I am not sure and I also don't know whether
> such a kernel might run on an XScale.
>
> Koen, considering that you have successfully built
> a 3900 image I assume that you have the needed replacement
> of -3.3.3 with -3.3.4 in your repository. Can you push them
> into oe-devel.bkbits.net?

I have no local changes when I build the images, otherwise I can't use
'bk tag' to keep the FSF happy.

regards,

Koen

>
>
>>Development of the handhelds.org kernels is done in handhelds.org
>>CVS. Patches hit OE/familiar once a new version has been tagged
>>in CVS.
>
>
> Then the question here is: should 0.8.3 be delayed until the
> MMC/SD card patch went into the upstream kernel and can be pulled
> from there in (presumably) -h41?
>

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (Darwin)

iD8DBQFCq/16MkyGM64RGpERAvArAKCwIWeZrpqKXVKShOsFGB9lmR3F0ACeMVW0
DgSJA4Uiuve4I08blmlb57c=
=oYS4
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Received on Sun Jun 12 2005 - 05:21:25 EDT