On Tue, 2005-06-07 at 08:51, Koen Kooi wrote:
> > >>I wouldn't recommend it. There is bound to be some collateral damage
> > >>from packages with hard-wired assumptions about the old ABI, and it
> > >>could well take more than a couple of weeks to shake that out. Also,
> > >>this would be a big ABI break for Familiar, which will require a bit of
> > >>discussion beforehand.
> >
> >
> > That's what I was affraid of. I intended to make 0.9.0 eabi, so it
> > looks
> > like 0.8.3 will see the light before that. And I should increase the
> > occurence of "eabi" on familiar-dev mails a bit. I guess the previous
> > mails weren't obvious enough :). CC:-ing familiar-dev and oz-devel to
> > incite for discussions.
>
> Nobody has an opinion on this?
Personally, I lack the necessary technical background knowledge to
comment on this in a useful way.
Maybe you can provide a few links on the topic.
Rene
Received on Fri Jun 10 2005 - 19:14:55 EDT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Mon Jul 25 2005 - 17:18:09 EDT