-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
> >>I wouldn't recommend it. There is bound to be some collateral damage
> >>from packages with hard-wired assumptions about the old ABI, and it
> >>could well take more than a couple of weeks to shake that out. Also,
> >>this would be a big ABI break for Familiar, which will require a bit of
> >>discussion beforehand.
>
>
> That's what I was affraid of. I intended to make 0.9.0 eabi, so it
> looks
> like 0.8.3 will see the light before that. And I should increase the
> occurence of "eabi" on familiar-dev mails a bit. I guess the previous
> mails weren't obvious enough :). CC:-ing familiar-dev and oz-devel to
> incite for discussions.
Nobody has an opinion on this?
regards,
Koen
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (Darwin)
iD8DBQFCpUPjMkyGM64RGpERAnRDAJ0cIWssv8zpn9WiIhmNrzEqTJf8lgCfbJ5i
PiBo+RB0iXwJpnZjH8NoBuM=
=pmL4
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Received on Tue Jun 07 2005 - 02:55:51 EDT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Mon Jul 25 2005 - 17:18:09 EDT