[Fwd: Re: Has anyone successfully built an EABI/iwmmxt image?]

From: Koen Kooi <koen_at_handhelds.org>
Date: Thu, 02 Jun 2005 08:11:36 +0200

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Sending with the address spelled right....
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (Darwin)

iD8DBQFCnqMXMkyGM64RGpERAp10AJ96m9S/5+KS+gmjr8udHwWHCCMP5gCcCmVw
OM/4tkjnFHnDPH8fM5JZ4Ns=
=o5z9
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

attached mail follows:


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Phil Blundell wrote:
> On Wed, 2005-06-01 at 22:54 +0200, Koen Kooi wrote:
>
>>Do you think it's feasible to build familiar 0.9.0 and oz 3.5.4/3.6.0
>>with eabi? Both are targeted for "July".
>
>
> I wouldn't recommend it. There is bound to be some collateral damage
> from packages with hard-wired assumptions about the old ABI, and it
> could well take more than a couple of weeks to shake that out. Also,
> this would be a big ABI break for Familiar, which will require a bit of
> discussion beforehand.

That's what I was affraid of. I intended to make 0.9.0 eabi, so it looks
like 0.8.3 will see the light before that. And I should increase the
occurence of "eabi" on familiar-dev mails a bit. I guess the previous
mails weren't obvious enough :). CC:-ing familiar-dev and oz-devel to
incite for discussions.

regards,

Koen

>
> p.
>
>
>

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (Darwin)

iD8DBQFCnia9MkyGM64RGpERAqHhAJ0VODOiygdsXkYnrtyVQbCc7x+jmwCgppBO
+XObwJwkqhVpPTq7+y38yOc=
=UlED
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
Oe mailing list
Oe_at_handhelds.org
https://www.handhelds.org/mailman/listinfo/oe
Received on Thu Jun 02 2005 - 02:16:44 EDT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Mon Jul 25 2005 - 17:18:09 EDT