Re: Running Familiar on uClibc?

Michael Opdenacker wrote:
> Hello,
>
> By the way, talking about the 0.9 release...
>
> Are there reasons for not using uClibc instead of glibc? We would save a
> significant amount of space (see
> http://free-electrons.com/doc/embedded_linux_tools/img81.html and
> http://free-electrons.com/doc/embedded_linux_tools/img82.html).
>
> If the whole Debian Woody was ported to uClibc, it's hard to figure out
> what's missing in uClibc...

The OZ people were testing it, but it's not working 100% at the moment.
I think the switch to eabi is enough stress for a 0.9.0 release. It is a
worthy goal to support it post 0.9.0. One meg is a lot.

regards,

Koen

>
> :-)
>
> Michael.
>
Received on Wed Apr 20 2005 - 17:28:51 EDT