Hello,
By the way, talking about the 0.9 release...
Are there reasons for not using uClibc instead of glibc? We would save a
significant amount of space (see
http://free-electrons.com/doc/embedded_linux_tools/img81.html and
http://free-electrons.com/doc/embedded_linux_tools/img82.html).
If the whole Debian Woody was ported to uClibc, it's hard to figure out
what's missing in uClibc...
:-)
Michael.
-- Michael Opdenacker http://free-electrons.com +33 621 604 642Received on Wed Apr 20 2005 - 17:02:18 EDT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Mon Jul 25 2005 - 17:18:09 EDT