Re: suspend/resume Plan 9: 2.14.? works, 2.18.{1,45} fails
From: Axel Belinfante (Axel.Belinfante@cs.utwente.nl)
Date: Tue Oct 29 2002 - 14:02:12 EST
- Next message: Hicks, Jamey: "RE: suspend/resume Plan 9: 2.14.? works, 2.18.{1,45} fails"
- Previous message: Hicks, Jamey: "RE: suspend/resume Plan 9: 2.14.? works, 2.18.{1,45} fails"
- In reply to: Hicks, Jamey: "RE: suspend/resume Plan 9: 2.14.? works, 2.18.{1,45} fails"
- Next in thread: Hicks, Jamey: "RE: suspend/resume Plan 9: 2.14.? works, 2.18.{1,45} fails"
- Messages sorted by:
[ date ]
[ thread ]
[ subject ]
[ author ]
[ attachment ]
- Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]
> To me, it sounds like plan9 is not putting the sdram into self-refresh.
> The bootldr is not involved in the suspend operation at all. All it
> does is wake up, notice that it was a resume, turn on dram, and then
> jump to the addess in the PSPR scratch pad register, transferring
> control back to the OS.
I think I see your point.
Still, how would this explain that suspend/resume with the same plan 9
kernel does work on one ipaq, and not on the other, where, seemingly,
the only difference is the bootldr version?
Hardware seems the same. What could we be overlooking?
Thanks,
Axel.
- Next message: Hicks, Jamey: "RE: suspend/resume Plan 9: 2.14.? works, 2.18.{1,45} fails"
- Previous message: Hicks, Jamey: "RE: suspend/resume Plan 9: 2.14.? works, 2.18.{1,45} fails"
- In reply to: Hicks, Jamey: "RE: suspend/resume Plan 9: 2.14.? works, 2.18.{1,45} fails"
- Next in thread: Hicks, Jamey: "RE: suspend/resume Plan 9: 2.14.? works, 2.18.{1,45} fails"
- Messages sorted by:
[ date ]
[ thread ]
[ subject ]
[ author ]
[ attachment ]
- Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5
: Fri Jan 17 2003 - 17:47:04 EST