From: Hicks, Jamey (Jamey.Hicks@hp.com)
Date: Thu Sep 05 2002 - 07:54:27 EDT
I would like to keep the MMU because it lets us cache regions selectively. When the bootldr access JFFS2 or VFAT having the cache enabled is pretty important.
I think we can drop one or two of the bootldr binaries though. Also, if we can make a PIC bootldr, then we could also combine SA11x0 and PXA support into one binary, which would make release management easier.
Jamey
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Chris McKillop [mailto:cdm@qnx.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, September 04, 2002 8:51 PM
> To: jamey@handhelds.org; bootldr@handhelds.org
> Subject: Re: [Bootldr] bootldr CHANGELOG
>
>
>
> Any reason to keep the MMU code in place at all anymore?
> Doesn't seem like
> it is worth-while if you can avoide it.
>
> chris
>
> --
> Chris McKillop <cdm@qnx.com> "The faster I go, the
> behinder I get."
> Software Engineer, QSSL -- Lewis Carroll --
> http://qnx.wox.org/
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: <jamey@handhelds.org>
> To: <bootldr@handhelds.org>
> Sent: Wednesday, September 04, 2002 3:06 PM
> Subject: [Bootldr] bootldr CHANGELOG
>
>
> > Update of /usr/cvs/bootldr
> > In directory handhelds.org:/usr/tmp/cvs-serv23759
> >
> > Modified Files:
> > CHANGELOG
> > Log Message:
> > removed requirement that MMU be enabled for PXA ARCH
> > _______________________________________________
> > Bootldr mailing list
> > Bootldr@handhelds.org
> > http://handhelds.org/mailman/listinfo/bootldr
> >
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Jan 17 2003 - 17:47:04 EST