Re: New build to host on my ftp

I still think we should get some sort of automated build system going...

On Jan 29, 2007, at 3:31 PM, Jean-Nicolas GRAUx wrote:

> Hi Pierre,
> No problem for building a new kernel image from latest HEAD &
> hosting it
> on my ftp. I'll do that soon...and will mail all when done.
>
> By the way, why not add aximx50_tsc2046_ts.c in this release even if
> it
> not fully functional ?
>
> Question : Do you know if someone tried to verify GPIO's values in
> aximx50-gpio.h ? It seems to be a clone from hx4700-gpio.h so many
> #define may be wrong...
>
> Bye.
>
> Message: 2
> Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2007 20:26:04 +0100
> From: Pierre GAUFILLET <pierre.gaufillet_at_magic.fr>
> Subject: Re: [Aximx50-port] Touchscreen chip is not an ADS
> 7846
> To: The porting effort for the Dell Axim x50
> <aximx50-port_at_handhelds.org>
> Message-ID: <45BE4A4C.3080302_at_magic.fr>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>
> Hi Paul,
>
> Paul Sokolovsky a crit :
>> Hello Pierre,
>>
>> Sunday, January 28, 2007, 9:54:14 PM, you wrote:
>>
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> the touchscreen is now working (probably for X50 and for sure
> for X51).
>>> I will post a first patch soon.
>>> I still have to define the coordinates transformation.
>>>
>>> Paul : I see you committed a new 7846 device-independent
> driver. Should
>>> I use this one from now ?
>>>
>>
>> Yes, I refactored it exactly for your use, and I'd
> appreciate if you
>> give it try (and win ;-) ). Please see h4000 code fro how to
> use it
>> (pretty simple actually, you just need to pass in pen down
> IRQ).
>>
>> I also confirmed that ADS7846 and TSC2046 are exact clones.
> Quoting
>> doc:
>> "The TSC2046 is 100% pin-compatible with the existing
>> ADS7846, and will drop into the same socket."
>> They talk about pin compatibility here, but looking at command
> bits,
>> programmatical interface is the same too. So, this is great
> news,
>> meaning that the whole dozen of PDAs can use the same driver.
> I will
>> try ads7846ts_ssp on hx4700 as the next thing to do too.
>>
> ok : go for it, then :-)
> Just a question : do you have any idea of the transfer laws to
> be used ?
> I get some really non-linear measurements...
>
>>
>>> Could you please commit the following modification to
>>> include/asm-arm/arch-pxa/memory.h ?
>>>
>>> #ifdef CONFIG_DRAM_BASE
>>> #define PHYS_OFFSET (CONFIG_DRAM_BASE)
>>> #else
>>> #define PHYS_OFFSET UL(0xa0000000)
>>> #endif
>>>
>>
>> Committed. So, can you confirm that with this modification
> CVS can
>> build bootable kernel for aximx50? It's time to tag next
> subrelease,
>> and I'd like to include working aximx50 into it.
>>
> It is ok. The HEAD kernel boots and the pxafb is working on my
> X51v.
> Tests should be done also on X50, X50v and X51...
>
> Jean-Nicolas : could you build and host this kernel image ?
>
>
> Pierre
>
>
> --
> _______________________________________________
> Aximx50-port mailing list
> Aximx50-port_at_handhelds.org
> https://www.handhelds.org/mailman/listinfo/aximx50-port
Received on Mon Jan 29 2007 - 19:22:25 EST