John Currey wrote:
> Worse their License is closed, dreadful, and talks about "No Reverse
> Engineering" when it is source code ;-) .
>
It appears to me that the content of the tarball is mostly compiled i386
libraries (shared and static), with a bit of source code glue.
> This could reduce the code
> to being only useful for looking at. Could looking at the code
> poison a new driver's GPL status?
>
>
It doesn't even appear that useful. Unless I'm missing something, these
drivers are a dead end.
-Michael Robinson
Received on Wed Jun 29 2005 - 23:12:58 EDT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Mon Jul 25 2005 - 18:10:03 EDT