embbuildd anyone?

From: Tim Riker <Tim.a.t.Rikers.org>
Date: Fri Feb 22 2002 - 19:16:05 EST

I'd like to see buildd extended to handle cross compiles. I think it is
a good place to start. "control" could have something like:

Target-Build-Depends: xlibs-dev
Host-Build-Depends: groff

So that libs and tools are handled differently. In some cases the tool
will need to be added to both places, and could probably use the
existing:

Build-Depends: foo

"rules" would be expected to handle "arm-linux-gcc" or "arm-uclibc-gcc"
style cross compile tools.

It should be possible to build a list of Build-Depends that are libs or
tools or both and get this up and running for many packages in a short
amount of time.

buildd for cross compiles. Perhaps that's embbuildd? or just embd? ;-)

Thoughts?

Erik Andersen wrote:
> This sounds good. I've been intending to set up debian buildd
> for churning out uClibc packages (in part to further test uClibc,
> but also because I think that would be cool), and it looks like
> your work may be quite helpful. Perhaps we can colaborate,

-- 
Tim Riker - http://rikers.org/ - short SIGs! <g>
All I need to know I could have learned in Kindergarten
... if I'd just been paying attention.
Received on Fri Feb 22 19:56:58 2002

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Tue May 04 2004 - 08:45:19 EDT